NOTICE

Forums are temporarily disabled while we are working on a new login procedure.

When migrating the old forums over to our new forums we were unable to retain the identity of the authors, so the old posts will show up as "anonymous". All NEW posts will show up credited to their authors. So please participate and share knowledge just as you have in the past.

You must log in if you are an existing user or register if you are a new user in order to contribute to the discussions.

Discussion Forums - The Hendrix Group
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsMaterial Select...Material Select...sulfur embrittlementsulfur embrittlement
Previous
 
Next
New Post
11/17/2002 9:00 AM
 
Hi, what would be the material with higher resistance to H2S environment? I refer to fontana, it says that higher Ni will be susceptible to sulfur attack due to Ni-S stability. Now I am using 304L, what is it a better material weldable and no galvanic corr that can replace the 304L? 2205? What other material beside it? Thanks! Cita
 
New Post
11/18/2002 9:00 AM
 
Hi Cita, Is it the failure same as hydrogen embrittlement?
 
New Post
11/18/2002 9:00 AM
 
Hi Rahimi, yes, very similar to H2 embrittlement, but basically, the hydrogen molecules are produced from the reaction of H2S and the Fe. This very small molecule hidrogen then enter the material and cause the material becomes brittle than normal condition. The crack can be initiated by H2 due to its molecular pressure, combined to existing residual stresses or applied stress. And Mr Hendrix, and others.... I am still a bit confuse to determine better material that is better than 304L. Refer to several articles, it is consistantly stated that 316L will be better than 304L, why is that so? is it because 316L contains higher Nickel? Why is it also stated in other reference book that Ni will increase susceptibility of the material? what is it exaclty the correlation between Ni and Fe+H2S reaction? Because refer to the tensile strength, reducing the possibility of SSC from occuring is to avoid using high hardness, or high strength materials which is obviously susceptible bec of their brittleness, i have compared the strength of 304L and 316L and they both are similar, including the hardness number. so, what is the basic reason of choosing 304L instead of 316L? (under condition : Temperature less than 100 Celcius,differential, moderate pressure). Thanks! CITA
 
New Post
11/18/2002 9:00 AM
 
Cita: You don't state whether the H2S environment is high or low (aqueous) temperature based. Assuming that you are referring to an aqueous environment, both 304SS and 316SS should perform equally well in an aqueous H2S environment with respect to corrosion and both should be resistant to H2S SSC if in the solution annealed condition and below HRC 22. 316SS typically will outperform 304SS in envionments causing pitting, i.e., chlorides. Hope this helps! David Hendrix The Hendrix Group Inc.
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsMaterial Select...Material Select...sulfur embrittlementsulfur embrittlement


  

News

With a little delay, our Calculation of Ammonium Salt Deposition Temperatures...read more
Our sulfidic corrosion calculators are now available at hghouston.com/calcula...read more

Stay Current

Sign up for our quarterly newsletter

covering updates on corrosion

Sign Up