NOTICE

Forums are temporarily disabled while we are working on a new login procedure.

When migrating the old forums over to our new forums we were unable to retain the identity of the authors, so the old posts will show up as "anonymous". All NEW posts will show up credited to their authors. So please participate and share knowledge just as you have in the past.

You must log in if you are an existing user or register if you are a new user in order to contribute to the discussions.

Discussion Forums - The Hendrix Group
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsMaterial Select...Material Select...Passive LayerPassive Layer
Previous
 
Next
New Post
1/12/2005 9:00 AM
 
What is the typical passive layer of a stainless steel tube in angstroms? (Based on raw material being .25) Does the passive layer thicken over time? Is a tube that is chemically passivated have a thicker passive layer than a tube that is mechanically passivated?
 
New Post
1/18/2005 9:00 AM
 
jodyh: The passive layer on an austenitic stainless steel is quite thin, on the order of a couple of angstroms. The film thickness is independent of the thickness of the component. The film forms quickly to a final thickness when sufficient oxygen potential is present. We're not sure how one "mechanically" passivates a stainless steel. Hope this helps! David Hendrix The Hendrix Group Inc.
 
New Post
2/8/2005 9:00 AM
 
When properly passivated the passive layer (chromium enriched) is 20-30 Angstroms thick. You cannot mechanically passivate stainless steel.
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsMaterial Select...Material Select...Passive LayerPassive Layer


  

News

With a little delay, our Calculation of Ammonium Salt Deposition Temperatures...read more
Our sulfidic corrosion calculators are now available at hghouston.com/calcula...read more

Stay Current

Sign up for our quarterly newsletter

covering updates on corrosion

Sign Up