NOTICE

Forums are temporarily disabled while we are working on a new login procedure.

When migrating the old forums over to our new forums we were unable to retain the identity of the authors, so the old posts will show up as "anonymous". All NEW posts will show up credited to their authors. So please participate and share knowledge just as you have in the past.

You must log in if you are an existing user or register if you are a new user in order to contribute to the discussions.

Discussion Forums - The Hendrix Group
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsMaterial Select...Material Select...Joining 316L to Carbon SteelJoining 316L to Carbon Steel
Previous
 
Next
New Post
4/4/2005 9:00 AM
 
Thanks for all the suggestions.
 
New Post
7/28/2005 9:00 AM
 
Only 309 or a higher alloyed transition electrode that gives ductile weldmetal mixture will do, a low carbon version is fine. 309Mo will not help because the other metal is carbon steel with a much less pitting resistance than 316L 309Mo is handy for cladding with Mo alloyed stainless steels 310 is more prone to hot cracking than 309. seal welding is fine depending on stresses and temp, rolling first and seal welding is better. also get a good edge preparation you cannot have too much weld there anyway: grinding off material may surface pores or pinholes. an orbital tube-tubesheet welder is here very handy and constant of quality / adding of fillerwire 308 is never usable here, this will give a partly brittle weld area Dennis
 
New Post
7/28/2005 9:00 AM
 
I am of the school of thought that says that it is better to weld first then roll rather than rolling first, except in the case of titanium to titanium which, of course, is not welded with filler wire. This is because gasses build up behind the weld, and with a un-rolled tube they can escape along the tube toward the rear of the tubesheet, while with a rolled tube, they have nowhere to go and build up pressure, which will push out through the molten weld metal causing a pinhole. Now, that said, there are those who swear by rolling first then welding, and cite years of experience with a variety of metallurgies using that procedure, so who am I to argue with their success. I wanted to present the other side of the arguement for the original poster's consideration. rmw
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsMaterial Select...Material Select...Joining 316L to Carbon SteelJoining 316L to Carbon Steel


  

News

With a little delay, our Calculation of Ammonium Salt Deposition Temperatures...read more
Our sulfidic corrosion calculators are now available at hghouston.com/calcula...read more

Stay Current

Sign up for our quarterly newsletter

covering updates on corrosion

Sign Up