NOTICE

Forums are temporarily disabled while we are working on a new login procedure.

When migrating the old forums over to our new forums we were unable to retain the identity of the authors, so the old posts will show up as "anonymous". All NEW posts will show up credited to their authors. So please participate and share knowledge just as you have in the past.

You must log in if you are an existing user or register if you are a new user in order to contribute to the discussions.

Discussion Forums - The Hendrix Group
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsOil Refinery Co...Oil Refinery Co...Visbreaker heater support failureVisbreaker heater support failure
Previous
 
Next
New Post
11/8/2005 9:00 AM
 
Dear members, We had frequent failure in the Visbreaker Heater top tube support plate. The furnace details are as follows, TYPE: Box type furnace with vertical coil arrangement with convection. No.of PASS: 04 Design tube metal temperature : 560-620 Deg.C Tube size : 101 mm OD x 8.0 MM AWT Tube Material : A335 GR.P9 Tube length : 10.9 mtrs. Fuel fired : Furnace Oil with 2-2.5 % sulphur SUPPORT ARRANGEMENT:- TOP ANCHOR SUPPORT. CAST PLATE IS DIRECTLY WELDED OVER THE PAD IN THE TOP RETURN BEND.(RIGID) BOTTOM SUPPORT: SPIGOT ARRAGEMENT (FREE MOVEMENT) TOP RETURN BED SUPPORT CAST PLATE IS 30 MM THICK AND 800 MM LONG OF 50 Cr- 50 Ni material.(Secured with bolting arrangment at heater outside in the beam) Failure: Top anchor support cast plate is frequently failing (breaking in to two halves) while heater in service. No abnormality in heater operation. Temperatures are within the design limit. We found casting defects in rest of the plate/failed samples and mostly of gas pockets,shrinkage,sand inclusion in cluster. My question apart from casting defect any other reason for such failure. 1)Is it sound practise to design visbreaker heater coil in vertical type rather than horizontal due to high operating temperature. 2)Is it a good design of providing top rigid anchor support in vertical coil arrangment in visbreaker heater? 3)What is the expected vertical differencial thermal expansion in such type of support. Tube material is P9 and support material is 50 Cr-50 Ni. 4)Can we replace the top rigid support with wall hanger cast support for free movement of tube vertically? 5)What about providing spring support in lieu of rigid anchor plate type support? Your comments are highly appreciated. With regards, krish
 
New Post
11/10/2005 9:00 AM
 
Krish Answer to this complicated design, material failrue problem is not easy to give on a discussion forum. Your problem needs a diagnostic analysis - from process and mechanical design of support for heater coils, failure history, material usage, laboratory analysis on nature of failure. on failed support brackets Suggest engage an experienced consultant - well versed in metalurgy, corrosion, design aspects - if in-house capabiity is limited for the same. Trust this is of help to you C.V.Srinivasan Nishi Engineers Pvt Ltd India Nov 11,2005 E-mail: nishi@vsnl.com >Dear members, > > We had frequent failure in the Visbreaker Heater top tube >support plate. The furnace details are as follows, > >TYPE: Box type furnace with vertical coil arrangement with >convection. > >No.of PASS: 04 > >Design tube metal temperature : 560-620 Deg.C > >Tube size : 101 mm OD x 8.0 MM AWT > >Tube Material : A335 GR.P9 > >Tube length : 10.9 mtrs. > >Fuel fired : Furnace Oil with 2-2.5 % sulphur > >SUPPORT ARRANGEMENT:- > >TOP ANCHOR SUPPORT. > >CAST PLATE IS DIRECTLY WELDED OVER THE PAD IN THE TOP RETURN >BEND.(RIGID) > >BOTTOM SUPPORT: SPIGOT ARRAGEMENT (FREE MOVEMENT) > >TOP RETURN BED SUPPORT CAST PLATE IS 30 MM THICK AND 800 MM >LONG OF 50 Cr- 50 Ni material.(Secured with bolting >arrangment at heater outside in the beam) > >Failure: Top anchor support cast plate is frequently failing >(breaking in to two halves) while heater in service. No >abnormality in heater operation. Temperatures are within the >design limit. We found casting defects in rest of the >plate/failed samples and mostly of gas >pockets,shrinkage,sand inclusion in cluster. > >My question apart from casting defect any other reason for >such failure. > >1)Is it sound practise to design visbreaker heater coil in >vertical type rather than horizontal due to high operating >temperature. > >2)Is it a good design of providing top rigid anchor support >in vertical coil arrangment in visbreaker heater? > >3)What is the expected vertical differencial thermal >expansion in such type of support. Tube material is P9 and >support material is 50 Cr-50 Ni. > >4)Can we replace the top rigid support with wall hanger cast >support for free movement of tube vertically? > >5)What about providing spring support in lieu of rigid >anchor plate type support? > >Your comments are highly appreciated. > >With regards, >krish
 
New Post
11/11/2005 9:00 AM
 
Krish Send me a small sketch drawing with the layout of the heater support locations. After that maybe we can share some constructive ideas. Regards Luis Marques luis.marques@galpenergia.com
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsOil Refinery Co...Oil Refinery Co...Visbreaker heater support failureVisbreaker heater support failure


  

News

With a little delay, our Calculation of Ammonium Salt Deposition Temperatures...read more
Our sulfidic corrosion calculators are now available at hghouston.com/calcula...read more

Stay Current

Sign up for our quarterly newsletter

covering updates on corrosion

Sign Up