NOTICE

Forums are temporarily disabled while we are working on a new login procedure.

When migrating the old forums over to our new forums we were unable to retain the identity of the authors, so the old posts will show up as "anonymous". All NEW posts will show up credited to their authors. So please participate and share knowledge just as you have in the past.

You must log in if you are an existing user or register if you are a new user in order to contribute to the discussions.

Discussion Forums - The Hendrix Group
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsOil Refinery Co...Oil Refinery Co...Urgent: PWHT or Stabilization of 347 Stainless tubes foUrgent: PWHT or Stabilization of 347 Stainless tubes fo
Previous
 
Next
New Post
4/19/2005 9:00 AM
 
Do 347 SS seamless tubes which will be cold rolled for a helical coil in a fired heater need stabilization prior to rolling? After rolling, do the tubes require PWHT to relieve stresses created during the bending process?
 
New Post
4/19/2005 9:00 AM
 
John S.S 347 cold rolled helical coil (for fired heaters) - i have seen some European process and piping specifications call for a stabilization anneal after cold rolling to avoid later complications of SCC. If helical coil bending (cold rolled coil) is > 10% it may be worthwhile to consider PWHT to relieve sresses after beding process. Theoretically SS 347 coil may not PWHT or stabilization anneal so long as the cold work is restricted to less than 10%. Trust this answers your querry C.V.Srinivasan Nishi Engineers Pvt Ltd Chennai 20. India april 20,2005 E-mail: nishi@vsnl.com >Do 347 SS seamless tubes which will be cold rolled for a >helical coil in a fired heater need stabilization prior to >rolling? After rolling, do the tubes require PWHT to >relieve stresses created during the bending process?
 
New Post
4/20/2005 9:00 AM
 
John As Srinivasan says normally SS 347 tubes are delivered under stabilized annealed condition after cold rolling. To avoid cold bending your tubes and PWHT after cold bending if possible you should use elbows instead of cold pipe bands Luis Marques
 
New Post
4/20/2005 9:00 AM
 
>John >As Srinivasan says normally SS 347 tubes are delivered under >stabilized annealed condition after cold rolling. To avoid >cold bending your tubes and PWHT after cold bending if >possible you should use elbows instead of cold pipe bands >Luis Marques Luis, I think you didn't get the picture. There are few furnaces where the radiation coils are basically a single helical coil. We do have a similar heater - radiation coils having OD 168.3 mm, TCD of 3082 & 16 nos. turns. The material is SS 321 H. The inlet is from top (ex-convection) & outlet is from bottom. The shell, as obvious, cylindrical & firing is from bottom. Regarding the HT process employed during fabrication process - I have to dig a bit - consult the original passpor. Regards Chakra
 
New Post
4/20/2005 9:00 AM
 
Chakra, You are correct. We are going to build a heater with a helical coil, 8" 0.311 wall bent to 12'-2" diameter (1 pass). I knew the straight tube would be anealed before sent from the mill, but wasn't sure if it required stabilization by the mill due to the high service temperature (skin temps could get close to 500 C. The other question was if, after bending, would it require PWHT to relieve bending stresses? Thanks for your prompt attention.
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsOil Refinery Co...Oil Refinery Co...Urgent: PWHT or Stabilization of 347 Stainless tubes foUrgent: PWHT or Stabilization of 347 Stainless tubes fo


  

News

With a little delay, our Calculation of Ammonium Salt Deposition Temperatures...read more
Our sulfidic corrosion calculators are now available at hghouston.com/calcula...read more

Stay Current

Sign up for our quarterly newsletter

covering updates on corrosion

Sign Up