NOTICE

Forums are temporarily disabled while we are working on a new login procedure.

When migrating the old forums over to our new forums we were unable to retain the identity of the authors, so the old posts will show up as "anonymous". All NEW posts will show up credited to their authors. So please participate and share knowledge just as you have in the past.

You must log in if you are an existing user or register if you are a new user in order to contribute to the discussions.

Discussion Forums - The Hendrix Group
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsOil Refinery Co...Oil Refinery Co...cracking at the three heat exchangerscracking at the three heat exchangers
Previous
 
Next
New Post
9/25/2005 9:00 AM
 
Hi The operating condition is: Shell operating condition; P= 75 kg/cm2 , T=90 C Tube operating condition: P= 22 kg/cm2, T= 310 c. And it is same for all three heat exchangers. The unit Mothballed until 97 .In 98 it was returned to the service and in 2002 again the stainless channel box cracked and repaired at that time. In 2005 it cracked again. The flow in all heat exchangers is kerosene with sulfur as vapor from the reactor. There is a small amount of hcl gas enter to the shell but its amount very low say 1 ppm or %BD ppm. The welding Procedure will post later. Thanks Mark
 
New Post
9/25/2005 9:00 AM
 
The flow it same at the tube side and shell side kerosene with slufide
 
New Post
9/26/2005 9:00 AM
 
Hi welding repair as the following: 1.For repair of cracks in the channel head and head-to-partition plate for exchangers num. 1& 2 , which are ASTM A204B (0.50 Mo), the use of WPS P3-3 is acceptable. PWHT will also be required. 2.Regarding the third heat exchanger , which is clad with 321 stainless steel, the use of WPS P8-2B is recommended using E308L filler metal since 321 is not available for the SMAW process. PWHT will not be necessary since welding is only to be done between the cladding and the partition plate (304L stainless steel). 3.For all repairs it is suggested to use a lower preheat (approx. 200 C) to avoid hot cracking problems. This is especially true for the third heat exchanger since the weld is between the 321 cladding and 304L partition and high interpass temperature can lead to hot cracking. 4.PMI should also be performed on third heat exchanger welds to assure that the weld metal is sufficiently similar to 321 SS. Root cause: I will not predict it is HIC problem since the h2s is vapor and the temperature is too high. IGSCC OR TGSCC is predictable since we have metal expansion through the partition cause stress on the claded 321ss . For the first and second there was wrong PWHT procedure since there was stress at the nozzle and partition plate. This is my input and any addition will be valued. Also, the shape of the crack is like knife attack at HAZ and it was in parallel. Thanks
 
New Post
9/26/2005 9:00 AM
 
Dear Mark, Hex #3 :- Your problem areas are at HAZ probably at 321 HAZ ? E 308L SMAW electrode is OK. Now w.r.t your appearance description of cracks it can be well presumed to be " Knife Line Attack (KLA)" which often happens near weld/HAZ interface because of dissolution of TiC by the weld temp. making it locally susceptible to attack in future. Since here the shell side T is 90C the chances of sensitisation is v. less but considering impacts of incidental aq. corrosive elements and delayed low temp. sensitisation issues can not be neglected. Again it is known that Aust. SS having higher thermal coefficient of expansion and thus produce higher shrinkage strains. Now if, E 308L electrode Ferrite No. (FN) if v. less ( it should be 5-8) than optimum requirement chances of Hot Cracking can originate as because of failure to acomodate shrinkage strains during weld solidification. This Solidification Hot Craking follows interdendritics and normally happened at HAZ unlike microfissuring which normally occurs at weld due to segregation of low melting point impurities. Thus most probably your damage mechanism is KLA + impact of low FN of electrode. regards
 
New Post
9/26/2005 9:00 AM
 
For your third heat exchanger I am not so sure if welding with E308L was the good option. Other option is to use E347-15 or E309Cb-15 whose are stabilized electrodes like your 321 clad. Regards Luis Marques Portugal
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsOil Refinery Co...Oil Refinery Co...cracking at the three heat exchangerscracking at the three heat exchangers


  

News

With a little delay, our Calculation of Ammonium Salt Deposition Temperatures...read more
Our sulfidic corrosion calculators are now available at hghouston.com/calcula...read more

Stay Current

Sign up for our quarterly newsletter

covering updates on corrosion

Sign Up