NOTICE

Forums are temporarily disabled while we are working on a new login procedure.

When migrating the old forums over to our new forums we were unable to retain the identity of the authors, so the old posts will show up as "anonymous". All NEW posts will show up credited to their authors. So please participate and share knowledge just as you have in the past.

You must log in if you are an existing user or register if you are a new user in order to contribute to the discussions.

Discussion Forums - The Hendrix Group
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsMaterial Select...Material Select...Caustic service(14.4 %)Caustic service(14.4 %)
Previous
 
Next
New Post
6/4/2010 9:00 AM
 
Dera Expert We are having a pump in caustic service(14.4 % Concentration).One of the component is ofDIN 1.4401 (Supplier material). Equivalent ASTM standard for the same is SS 316.I would like whether SS 304 can be used as replacement for SS 316 in caustic service(14.4%).iF no why it cannot be used?If yes how it can be justified Regards
 
New Post
6/7/2010 9:00 AM
 
The applicability of various SS under different caustic conc depends on application temperature, stress level and Ni loading in SS grade. Pl. discuss temperature issues and operating conditions. regards >Dera Expert > >We are having a pump in caustic service(14.4 % >Concentration).One of the component is ofDIN 1.4401 >(Supplier material). > >Equivalent ASTM standard for the same is SS 316.I would like > whether SS 304 can be used as replacement for SS 316 in >caustic service(14.4%).iF no why it cannot be used?If yes >how it can be justified > >Regards
 
New Post
6/7/2010 9:00 AM
 
[updated:LAST EDITED ON Jun-07-10 AT 11:20 PM (CDT)]Phenomenon of SCC would likely to occur in caustic services but the crack susceptibility of SS 304 and 316 is almost the same. If the vendor has chosen SS 316 for your environment, I think there is no problem in using SS 304 instead of SS 316. You may confirm from the vendor also as to what major difference exists between SS 316 and SS 304 in caustic service. Usually Austenitic Stainless Steel is not considered that helpful in caustic services than Carbon Steel. With higher concentration >50% and temperature >100 deg C, it is advisable to move to Nickel alloys directly. Hope this would help. Regards, Ashfaq Anwer http://thepetrostreet.com
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsMaterial Select...Material Select...Caustic service(14.4 %)Caustic service(14.4 %)


  

News

With a little delay, our Calculation of Ammonium Salt Deposition Temperatures...read more
Our sulfidic corrosion calculators are now available at hghouston.com/calcula...read more

Stay Current

Sign up for our quarterly newsletter

covering updates on corrosion

Sign Up