NOTICE

Forums are temporarily disabled while we are working on a new login procedure.

When migrating the old forums over to our new forums we were unable to retain the identity of the authors, so the old posts will show up as "anonymous". All NEW posts will show up credited to their authors. So please participate and share knowledge just as you have in the past.

You must log in if you are an existing user or register if you are a new user in order to contribute to the discussions.

Discussion Forums - The Hendrix Group
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsOil Refinery Co...Oil Refinery Co...Temper embrittlementTemper embrittlement
Previous
 
Next
New Post
6/9/2007 9:00 AM
 
P22, P11 material are susceptible to Temper Embrittlement and thus "J" and "X" factors are given due consideration. X-Bar factor per Bruscato's formula = (10P +5Sb +4Sn +As ) x 10 -2 and default value is 15X max. Q1. Whether Electrode/ Filler manufacturer gives due consideration to this factor while manufacturing or Purchaser has to put special clause in the Ordering Information ? Please share your views. Q2. As temper embrittlement has no direct after effect with T.S , Y.S , Hardness , %El but the impact props gets severely reduced. Now how much cumulative "effect temperature" exposure is required to affect the impact values which can be foreseen without any destructive testing for FFP. regads
 
New Post
6/10/2007 9:00 AM
 
Debasis Q-1: on Electrode Manufacturers - Some elecrode manufacturers have developed special electrdodes . Kobe steel is known to have developed one such electrode CMA-106 N for heavy walled pressure vessels made of low -alloy Cr-Mo steel. based on extensive research To answer your question : If J < 180 it is generally not susceptible for temper embrittlement. For weld metal - if P e is < 3 it can avoid embrittlement . I am not sure how such information will help a user for ordering filler wires or electrodes . To what extent such ordering information will serve a user in getting the desired results as "temper embrittlement" of low alloy Cr-Mo steel in hydro desulphurization reactor or in syn gas service in chemical / fertilizer service plants" is long term exposure effect phenomenon. Temper embrittlement occurs after prolonged exposures close to 450-480 deg centigrade over periods of > 50,000 hrs or 100,000 hrs or more. What type of guarantees any manufacturer can give or assure to a user - even if an ordering information specifies this as purchse clause ? From a practical stand point and common engineering application no manufacturer will stand guarantee for > 18 months from date of manufacture or 12 monhs from start of commissioning an equipment. Besides there are other factors which affect performance of heavy walled Cr-Mo low alloy steels - other than segregations or impurtiies but also considerations of operation and maintenance history of the plant to reduce the life. Q-2: For a practical user working in a petro-chemical plant, to me it appears that your question is more theoretical than practical use. To day, there are NDE techniques available to evaluate the effect of "temper embrittlement" - both NDE and in-situ micro-structural studies in low alloy steels. When today techniques are available to evaluate by NDE /micro studies why to think of destructive testing (FFP) of a low alloy Cr-Mo materials used for pressure vessels exposed to temperature in the range of 350-550 deg cent in petro chemical or fertilizer plants for > 50,000 - 100,000 hr service If you are interested to study literature, there are some basic books on Alloy Steels - Basic to understanding published by ASM and Damage mechanisms in low alloy steels - an excellent symposium collection of fundamental and practical application set of papers published by Viswanthan et al - again ASM publication ( i am not sure). Indira Gandhi Atomic Research Centre Kalpakkam have done also research studies on low alloy cr-mo steels - which may have theoretically interest for a user. Trust this will help you C.V.Srinivasan Nishi Engineers Pvt Ltd India June 10, 2007 E-mail: nishi@vsnl.com >P22, P11 material are susceptible to Temper Embrittlement >and thus "J" and "X" factors are given due consideration. >X-Bar factor per Bruscato's formula = (10P +5Sb +4Sn +As ) x >10 -2 and default value is 15X max. > >Q1. Whether Electrode/ Filler manufacturer gives due >consideration to this factor while manufacturing or >Purchaser has to put special clause in the Ordering >Information ? Please share your views. > >Q2. As temper embrittlement has no direct after effect with >T.S , Y.S , Hardness , %El but the impact props gets >severely reduced. Now how much cumulative "effect >temperature" exposure is required to affect the impact >values which can be foreseen without any destructive testing >for FFP. >regads
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsOil Refinery Co...Oil Refinery Co...Temper embrittlementTemper embrittlement


  

News

With a little delay, our Calculation of Ammonium Salt Deposition Temperatures...read more
Our sulfidic corrosion calculators are now available at hghouston.com/calcula...read more

Stay Current

Sign up for our quarterly newsletter

covering updates on corrosion

Sign Up