NOTICE

Forums are temporarily disabled while we are working on a new login procedure.

When migrating the old forums over to our new forums we were unable to retain the identity of the authors, so the old posts will show up as "anonymous". All NEW posts will show up credited to their authors. So please participate and share knowledge just as you have in the past.

You must log in if you are an existing user or register if you are a new user in order to contribute to the discussions.

Discussion Forums - The Hendrix Group
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsOil Refinery Co...Oil Refinery Co...PWHT of A516Gr 60 plates clad with TP304LPWHT of A516Gr 60 plates clad with TP304L
Previous
 
Next
New Post
10/29/2003 9:00 AM
 
We are going to replace a column in A516Gr 60 to be clad with TP 304L on top between tray 2 and 3 and from tray 11 to the bottom. The previous column was not clad and it was PWHT because it works in AMINE service. T he purpose of cladding this amine vessel is to prevent wet H2S cracking. During the stress relief of c.s A516Gr 60 plate’s clad with TP304L is there the possibility of carbide precipitation between the carbon steel and the stainless steel? Would it be prudent to PWHT only the A 516Gr 60 plates not clad or we shall PWHT the vessel as a whole, clad and unclad C.S. plates? An answer would be appreciated Regards Luis Marques
 
New Post
11/8/2003 9:00 AM
 
Luis: I would not expect significant carbon migration from the carbon steel substrate to the 304SS liner resulting from a stress relief heat treatment. However, stress relieving a 304SS clad carbon steel tower is a probably not a good idea, based on the potential for damaging the integrity of the 304SS liner during the stress relief operation. Hope this helps! David Hendrix The Hendrix Group Inc.
 
New Post
11/10/2003 9:00 AM
 
Mr Hendrix The carbon steel plates are 13mm Thick with a 3mm thick clad of TP304L .We are going to link by welding these plates to other carbon steel plates 13mm Thick without cladding. For that reason I am afraid that the temperature developed by PWHT on the seam welding between clad an non clad plates could disbound the TP 304L. Maybe the best option is to clad the entire column. The savings on heat treatment will permit that option Thank you for the empathy Receive my best regards Luis Marques
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsOil Refinery Co...Oil Refinery Co...PWHT of A516Gr 60 plates clad with TP304LPWHT of A516Gr 60 plates clad with TP304L


  

News

With a little delay, our Calculation of Ammonium Salt Deposition Temperatures...read more
Our sulfidic corrosion calculators are now available at hghouston.com/calcula...read more

Stay Current

Sign up for our quarterly newsletter

covering updates on corrosion

Sign Up