NOTICE

Forums are temporarily disabled while we are working on a new login procedure.

When migrating the old forums over to our new forums we were unable to retain the identity of the authors, so the old posts will show up as "anonymous". All NEW posts will show up credited to their authors. So please participate and share knowledge just as you have in the past.

You must log in if you are an existing user or register if you are a new user in order to contribute to the discussions.

Discussion Forums - The Hendrix Group
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsGeneral Corrosi...General Corrosi...Corrosion of 316L Stainless SteelCorrosion of 316L Stainless Steel
Previous
 
Next
New Post
10/26/2002 9:00 AM
 
I work for an electrical utility in SE Asia. We have experienced failure of 20 Vacuum interrupters used in our electrical circuit breakers; the installed base of interrupters is approximately 3000. The mode of failure is apparently due to corrosion of the stainless steel bellows on the interrupter, which is effectively a moving seal between the vacuum chamber and the external contact drive. The steel is grade 316L and the bellows are 0.13mm thick. An investigation by the OEM concluded that the failures can be attributed to small holes in the bellows caused by chloride corrosion – this is backed up by SEM analysis which found chlorine around the holes; they postulate that the prevailing high temperatures and humidity combined with close proximity to the sea results in condensation occurring on the bellows, which dissolves chlorides thereby liberating elemental chlorine, which sets up corrosive pitting of the bellows; subsequent evaporation leaves a higher concentration of chlorine thereby accelerating the process. The area in which the bellows are contained has a plastic %91end plate’ which restricts the airflow through a clearance of 0.15 – 0.2 mm therefore the area is not well ventilated. During the investigation we installed temperature and humidity loggers within the circuit breaker enclosures and considering the results obtained it is doubtful as to whether condensation is taking place – max RH approximately 75% and approximately 2-3 degrees difference in temp throughout 24-hr period (this is due to internal heaters installed within the enclosure, which are designed to prevent condensation). The conditions are pretty constant throughout the year. There is no heavy industry to speak of therefore the environmental issues can be attributed to the effects of the sea only. Since I have no knowledge of this subject, I would appreciate any comments as to whether the above explanation is feasible and if so should we not have experienced a more widespread failure rate if this is due to uniform environmental conditions. Thanks
 
New Post
11/5/2002 9:00 AM
 
Hello Stephen, First, I would say the use of 316/L is correct in your coastal area.But from your explanation, the equipment affected look like having 'crevice' hence crevice corrosion could occur. Remember that the tighter the crevice, the higher the risk of corrosion. So the solutions should be to design out the crevice or ensure the crevice dry ( you put heater, I think it's good idea ) or use higher corrosion resistant SS.
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsGeneral Corrosi...General Corrosi...Corrosion of 316L Stainless SteelCorrosion of 316L Stainless Steel


  

News

With a little delay, our Calculation of Ammonium Salt Deposition Temperatures...read more
Our sulfidic corrosion calculators are now available at hghouston.com/calcula...read more

Stay Current

Sign up for our quarterly newsletter

covering updates on corrosion

Sign Up